After drinks in the hotel to the fake maotai

After drinks in the hotel to the fake maotai, consumer one-time purchase of a 17. Zhang Hotel prosecution to court ordered double indemnity. Yesterday was informed that the Haidian District Court held that "impact" is not part of needs does not support double indemnity. This year the Baiyun hotel dining drinking a bottle of 1488 53 degrees when flying in Guizhou maotai liquor. After dinner, hePurchased 17 bottles of wine and identification sent to gongshangsuo. Qualified swtor power leveling, he purchased was not Kweichow moutai company limited production. Then, make the hotel sued on the Court, request the Decree of the hotels double indemnity 18 bottles of wine is worth a total of $ 53,568. Proceedings, Mr Zhang said the first bottles of the drink in the hotel had he found the liquor was adulterated liquor, one-time purchase17 bottles simply to "fake". The Court held that the fraud operators offering goods or services, shall, in accordance with the requirements of consumers double indemnity. But this "consumer" refers to the need to buy for your life or the goods or services of the individual. Mr Zhang bought and drank 1 bottle of maotai liquor in a restaurant, belonging to the need to purchase merchandise for your life, this bottle should beDouble indemnity. Knowing the liquor was adulterated liquor, and "fake" for the purpose of buying 17 bottles of wine, not part of the need to purchase merchandise for your life, it requires double indemnity, should not be supported. Finally, the Court Hotel refund the purchase price $ 26,784 and compensate for the loss of the first bottle of wine $ 1488.